Drawing for TOWER

USPTO serial 79182700

TOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu

L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1445 North Loop West, Suite 410Houston, TX 77008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Platinum metal; alloys of precious metal; precious metals, unwrought or semi-wrought; jewellery cases in the nature of jewellery caskets and jewellery boxes; precious stones; jewelry in the nature of ornaments jewellery; jewelry in the nature of necklaces jewellery; trinkets jewellery in the nature of jewelry; jewelry in the nature of rings jewellery; watchesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 24, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 18, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 19, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 3, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance