Drawing for OLIO CLASSIC

USPTO serial 79182797

OLIO CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIO CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Sealing caps, bottle closures and individual parts therefor of metal, in particular for vessels of metal, glass, plastic, porcelain, ceramic and woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Sealing caps, bottle closures and individual parts therefor of plastic, in particular for vessels of metal, glass, plastic, porcelain, ceramic and woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 4, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 29, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance