USPTO serial 79183024
LSP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5450502Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2018
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LSP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
Feldkirchen an der Donau, AT
Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines, namely, machines for the recycling of plastics; machines and apparatus for the plastics industry and/or process engineering, in particular machines and apparatus for the treatment and processing of plastics; [ rolling mills, in particular testing rolling mills, measuring rolling mills and/or rubber rolling mills; machines in the nature of calenders, in particular ] sheeting calenders, dual-roller calenders, [ laminating calenders, moulding calenders for tablets and/or polishing calenders; industrial machine presses, in particular plate presses, test presses, de-airing pugmills and/or high temperature presses; kneading machines for industrial purposes, namely, double-shafted kneaders; ] extrusion moulding machines, namely, [ metal extrusion presses, ] twin-screw extruders, test extruders, measuring extruders, [ rubber extruders; ] machine tools in the nature of pelletizers, in particular strand pelletizers [ and die-face pelletizers; machines for the production of extrudates for medical purposes ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | [ Semi-processed plastic substances; semi-finished products made of thermoplastics produced either in polymerization or polycondensation, namely, PET-preforms, post consumer plastic flakes from plastic washing lines; plastic raw fibers for insulation ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Treatment of materials, namely, recycling of all types of PE, PP, PET, PA, EVOH and other thermoplastics with the exception of PVC, either produced by polymerization or polycondensation; recycling services; waste treatment; recycling of waste and trash, in particular for plastics ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Next Generation Recyclingmaschinen GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named LSP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |