Drawing for QUIET BUBBLE

USPTO serial 79183244

QUIET BUBBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5188766Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2017
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUIET BUBBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law LLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, active noise reduction headrest systems composed of loudspeakers, microphones, power amplifiers and control electronics; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or imagesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Evaluations and assessments in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers for active noise control, active noise reduction, active noise cancellation, and active vibration control; scientific and technical research in the field of active noise control, active noise reduction, active noise cancellation, and active vibration control; research and development of new products for others; technical research in the field of active noise control, active noise reduction, active noise cancellation, and active vibration control studiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 24, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 3, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 9, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 8, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 25, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 25, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance