USPTO serial 79183343
PURE LOIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5116563Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2017
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PURE LOIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Grieco
Mary L. Grieco Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP1325 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines with Protected Appellation of Origin or Controlled Appellation of Origin (AOC) from the region of Loire in France, namely, wines protected by one of the Appellations of Origin which can also contain the wording "Val de Loire" and wines protected by one of the following Appellations of Origin: "Anjou-Coteaux de la Loire "Crémant de Loire" [ Montlouis-sur-Loire", "Muscadet Coteaux de la Loire", "Pouilly-sur-Loire" ], "Rosé de Loire" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 28, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |