Drawing for OJMAR-NEXO

USPTO serial 79183581

OJMAR-NEXO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OJMAR-NEXO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee

ELIZABETH LEE LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radio frequency identification devices, namely, transponders; transponders; electric or electronic locks, electric apparatus for opening doors, namely, electric strikes for remote control of door ingress and egress; checking and supervision apparatus, namely, electronic readers and controllers for controlling access to cabinets, lockers or premisesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 14, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 14, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Mar 2, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance