USPTO serial 79183726
GOURD BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 2, 2017
- Examiner
- PAINTER, VALERIYA SHERMAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GOURD BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | [ Bowls and basins; ] Bottles, namely, glass bottles, sold empty; Spice sets in the nature of spice racks and spice jars sold empty; [ Utensils for household purposes, namely, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks; ] [ Tableware, other than knives, forks and spoons, namely, basins in the nature of bowls, bowls, plates, glass jars, jugs, pots, non-electric kettles; ] Pitchers; Jugs; [ Oil cruets; ] Glass jars and carboys [; Painted beverage glassware ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG HANBANG HOUSEHOLD GLASSWARE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GOURD BABY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 9, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 5, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |