Drawing for CAROLO-CUP

USPTO serial 79183777

CAROLO-CUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5211264Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2017
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAROLO-CUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew M. Calderon

ANDREW M. CALDERON ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN COLE & CALDERO7918 JONES BRANCH DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Practical training demonstrations in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology; conducting of games on the internet also on the mobile internet, educational services in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology competitions, arranging and conducting of sporting and cultural events, arranging and conducting of conferences and congresses in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology, arranging and conducting of live concerts, arranging and conducting of symposiums in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology, arranging and conducting of seminars, workshops, and colloquiums in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology, organisation of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, organisation of competitions for education or entertainment, namely, organizing competitions in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology, educational services, namely, providing access to online learning in the fields of autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, science and technology competitionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 1, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 28, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 16, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 15, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 30, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 3, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 29, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance