USPTO serial 79183957
HOLDSWORTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLDSWORTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Bucci
Peter Bucci Notaro Michalos & Zaccaria PC100 Dutch Hill Road, Suite 240Orangeburg, NY 10962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Cycles; cycle frames; bicycles; bicycle frames; structural parts for all of the aforesaid; bicycle component parts, namely, bottom brackets for bicycles, seat posts for bicycles, set clamps for bicycles, crank-sets for bicycles, sprockets for bicycles, chain-sets for bicycles, chain rings for bicycles, gear wheels for bicycles, derailleurs for bicycles, derailleur hangers for bicycles, headsets for bicycles, wheel rims and spokes for bicycles, bicycle forks; handlebars; handlebar tape, namely, tape specially designed for attachment to bicycle handlebars; bicycle handlebar stems; bicycle wheels and hubs; bicycle cranks; bicycle pedals, toe clips and toe straps; bicycle saddles; bicycle seats; bicycle bells | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops and bottoms; footwear; waterproof clothing, namely, waterproof jackets and pants; jackets; coats; shirts; t-shirts; polo shirts; jerseys; sweaters; hooded tops; trousers; jeans; shorts; leggings; tights; underwear; socks; gloves; mittens; shoes; boots; hats; caps; beanies; skull caps; headbands; cycling shirts; cycling tops; cycling shorts; cycling footwear; cycling shoes; cycling socks; cycling overshoes; cycling headwear; cycling hats; cycling caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2016 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |