USPTO serial 79184025
VIBRO-IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5153189Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 7, 2017
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VIBRO-IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Weissman
Peter S. Weissman Blank Rome LLP1825 Eye Street NWWashington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools and machines, namely, pneumatic machines for the controlled application of hammer blows, pneumatic machines for the controlled application of chisel blows, pneumatic machines for promoting removal of fasteners, pneumatic metal working machines, pneumatic machines for bending | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Hand-operated tools and implements for the construction of machines, apparatus and vehicles, namely, hammers, chisels, punches, rammers, graving tools, wrenches, drills, hand-operated cutting tools ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Müller-Werkzeug GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Müller-Werkzeug GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Müller-Werkzeug GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named VIBRO-IMPACT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |