Drawing for JEANOLOGIA

USPTO serial 79184184

JEANOLOGIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JEANOLOGIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; trousers; headgear; jeans; footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2026LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 21, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2025LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance