USPTO serial 79184196
BIOLOGY SMART SKINCARE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOLOGY SMART SKINCARE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby shampoo; dandruff treatments in the form of shampoos; hair shampoo; herbal anti-dandruff shampoo; non-medicated hair shampoos; facial washes (cosmetic); baby lotions; body lotions (other than for medical purposes); cleansing lotions; eye wrinkle lotions; facial lotions (cosmetic); hair lotions; hair protection lotions; hair setting lotion; hair strengthening treatment lotions; hair styling lotions; lotion for the eyes (non-medicated); moisturising body lotion (cosmetic); moisturising lotions (cosmetic); moisturising skin lotions (cosmetic); non-medicated face lotion; non-medicated hand lotion; non-medicated lotions; non-medicated skin clarifying lotions; non-medicated skin lotions; shaving lotions; skin care lotions (cosmetic); skin lotions (cosmetic); bar soap; body soaps; facial soaps; shaving soap; shaving creams; shaving gels; blended essential oils; essential oils; essential oils for personal use; cleansing facial masks; facial care products (cosmetic); facial cleansers; facial creams (cosmetic); facial masks (cosmetic); facial moisturisers (cosmetic); facial scrubs (cosmetic); facial toners (cosmetic); cleansing products for the eyes; cosmetic eye gels; eye lotions for cosmetic use; eye make up remover; eye moisturisers for cosmetic use; lotions for the removal of eye make-up; non-medicated creams for the eyes; creams for wrinkles; serum (cosmetic preparations); beauty masks; cleaning masks for the face; cosmetic masks; masks for the face (cosmetic); body scrubs; non-medicated creams for facial scrubs; scrubs (preparations), other than for medical use; anti-ageing creams; anti-aging creams; anti-wrinkle cream; body creams (cosmetics); cleansing creams; cream for skin whitening; cream milks; creams for firming the skin; day creams; dermatological creams (other than medicated); hand cream; night creams (cosmetics); skin care creams (cosmetic); skin creams (cosmetic); skin whitening creams; non-medicated creams for the lips; non-medicated lip balms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |