Drawing for PSF

USPTO serial 79184458

PSF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PSF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Ferren

Andrew J. Ferren Goulston & Storrs PC400 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02110-3333UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Driving motors other than for land vehicles, and machine tools; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; actuators, namely, parameterisable actuators and linear actuators; hydraulic and pneumatic explosion-proof control apparatus, namely, actuators for valves; hydraulic and pneumatic explosion-proof control devices, namely, valves with actuators used to control the flow of air, gases, liquids and solids; control apparatus, namely, actuators for valves with mechanical energy stores for emergency control functions; control devices, namely, valves with actuators used to control the flow of air, gases, liquids and solids with mechanical energy stores for emergency control functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electronic control apparatus and control devices, in particular electronic positioners, position indicators, wired and wireless field buses and processors, all being in particular for process monitoring and control; electronic explosion-proof control apparatus, namely, actuators for valves; electronic explosion-proof control devices, namely, valves with actuators used to control the flow of air, gases, liquids and solids; control apparatus, namely, actuators for valves with electronic energy stores for emergency control functions; control devices, namely, valves with actuators used to control the flow of air, gases, liquids and solids with electronic energy stores for emergency control functions; control apparatus and control devices with local control devices; parameterisable and linear electric actuators for valvesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 24, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 8, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 26, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance