Drawing for APERTIS

USPTO serial 79184672

APERTIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5258136Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 8, 2017
Examiner
BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with APERTIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical consultancy relating to assessing open-source software for use in the automotive industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 5, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 4, 2024EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2024PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Mar 25, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 13, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance