USPTO serial 79184751
HRC TECCAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5143899Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2017
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HRC TECCAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara A. Friedman
Barbara A. Friedman EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC9801 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing facilities for educational training in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing training relating to robotics and automation technology, in particular in the form of attendance seminars; Web-based online training and online virtual classroom training in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Education, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, educational conferences, tutoring, educational field trips, and an online course of study in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Coaching in the nature of providing educational mentoring in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing educational demonstrations in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Instruction in the field of robotics and automation technology; Arranging and conducting courses, seminars and workshops in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Educational services, namely, providing courses in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing information relating to providing of training and instruction, in particular relating to robotics and automation technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 14, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |