USPTO serial 79184884
THINBARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5121593Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2017
- Examiner
- BAL, KAMAL SINGH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINBARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy S. Gordet
Roy S. Gordet Law Office of Roy S. Gordet235 Westlake Center #452Daly City, CA 94015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper and cardboard; coated paper, siliconized paper, greaseproof paper; kraft papers, corrugated papers, laminated papers; paper for making bags and sacks; wrapping paper, packaging paper, packaging paperboard, paperboard and cardboard, liquid packaging paperboard, paper and cardboard boxes and paper bags, also featuring plastic or foils; natural fiber-reinforced plastic films for wrapping and packaging | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 29, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | NC71 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 23, 2023 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 20, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |