USPTO serial 79184925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Purdue
DAVID C PURDUE PURDUE LAW OFFICES LLC2735 N HOLLAND SYLVANIA ROAD SUITE B2TOLEDO, OH 43615UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | vodka; prepared alcoholic cocktails; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; alcoholic beverages, except beer; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits; alcoholic bitters | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |