Drawing for TALKA

USPTO serial 79184925

TALKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TALKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. Purdue

DAVID C PURDUE PURDUE LAW OFFICES LLC2735 N HOLLAND SYLVANIA ROAD SUITE B2TOLEDO, OH 43615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033vodka; prepared alcoholic cocktails; pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-based; alcoholic beverages, except beer; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits; alcoholic bittersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 5, 2019FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 31, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 31, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 31, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 2, 2016OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2016OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 18, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 29, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance