Drawing for SPADGER

USPTO serial 79185107

SPADGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5202154Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2017
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPADGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer peripheral devices; blank USB flash drives; tablet computers; photocopiers, namely, photographic, electrostatic, and thermic copying machines; smartphones; cabinets for loudspeakers; television apparatus for projection purposes; stands for photographic apparatus; electric batteriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 26, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 12, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 2, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 1, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 16, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 16, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance