USPTO serial 79185158
MRK TECCAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5168933Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2017
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MRK TECCAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara A. Friedman
Barbara A. Friedman EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC9801 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing facilities for educational training in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing training relating to robotics and automation technology in the form of attendance seminars; Web-based online training and online virtual classroom training in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Education, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, educational conferences, tutoring, educational field trips, and an online course of study in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Coaching in the nature of providing educational mentoring in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing educational demonstrations in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Instruction in the field of robotics and automation technology; Arranging and conducting courses, seminars and workshops in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Educational services, namely, providing courses in the fields of robotics and automation technology; Providing information relating to providing of training and instruction in the fields of robotics and automation technology | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |