USPTO serial 79185170
Q-MAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5225210Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2017
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with Q-MAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Drunen, NL
NL-5151 RM Drunen, NL
NL-5151 RM Drunen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison St., Suite AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Installations and apparatus for filtration and separation of fluid and industrial fluid flows, in particular for use in the metal industry, namely, particle separation devices in the nature of automatic magnetic separators for removing particles from fluids using magnetic fields; fluid separators for removing particles from fluids using magnetic fields in the nature of automatic magnetic | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Installations and apparatus for the purification, filtration and disinfection of fluid and industrial fluid flows using magnetism and magnetic fields for use in the metal industry, namely, environmental control apparatus, namely, magnetic fluid treatment apparatus for the treatment of industrial fluids; filters being parts of industrial installations for purification and treatment of fluid and industrial fluid flows, namely, particle separators for the cleaning and purification of liquids for removing particles from fluids using magnetic fields; purification apparatus for fluids, namely, particle separators for removing particles from fluids using magnetic fields; disinfection apparatus, namely, particle separators for the cleaning and purification of liquids for removing particles from fluids using magnetic fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |