USPTO serial 79185287
MISTERVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISTERVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum cleaners for the household and industrial sector; vacuum cleaner parts, included in this class; vacuum cleaner hoses; vacuum cleaner nozzles; vacuum cleaner brush rollers; vacuum cleaner cables; vacuum cleaner attachments, namely, furniture brushes and radiator attachments; vacuum cleaner covers; vacuum cleaner plates; vacuum cleaner wheels and rims; vacuum cleaner motors and motor parts; vacuum cleaner housing parts; vacuum cleaner adapters; bags for use in vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner filters; vacuum cleaner accessories for releasing fragrances and/or disinfectants; vacuum cleaner accessories, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Menakker, Andreas
- Other trademarks owned by Schwietzer, Tino
- Other trademarks owned by Schwietzer, Tino
- Other trademarks owned by Schwietzer, Tino
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named MISTERVAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |