USPTO serial 79185360
MB OLIVES PREMIUM QUALITY ANATOLIAN OLIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- TOY, JOSHUA SPENCER JOLL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with MB OLIVES PREMIUM QUALITY ANATOLIAN OLIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SINIRLI SORUMLU MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI MARMARABIRLIK
TR
S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
TR
Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
TR
Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Swartz
Michael F. Swartz Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Meat; fish, not live; poultry; game; meat extracts; broth; processed meat; frozen meat; dried meat; fried meat; meat jellies; meat juices; ] Pulses for food, namely, preserved beans and processed beans, processed chickpeas, lentil in the nature of dried lentils, processed soy beans; instant or pre-cooked soups; bouillon; processed olives; olive pastes; pickles; milk and milk products, namely, milk, cheese, yoghurt, drink based on yoghurt in the nature of ayran, cream, milk powder, milk based beverages containing fruits; edible oils and fats; olive oil; butter; margarine; dried, preserved, canned, frozen fruits and vegetables; processed fruits and vegetables; tomato puree; tomato paste; processed and roasted chickpeas, nuts, peanuts, walnuts, pistachio; peanut butter; hazelnut paste; tahini sesame seed paste; jams; marmalades; fruit jellies; eggs; powdered eggs; potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SINIRLI SORUMLU MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI MARMARABIRLIK
- Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
- Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MB OLIVES PREMIUM QUALITY ANATOLIAN OLIVES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |