Drawing for TELAVOX

USPTO serial 79185398

TELAVOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, SIDDHARTH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELAVOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications and telecommunication networks apparatus and equipment, namely, computer hardware for telecommunications, telecommunication cables, telecommunication switches, telecommunication exchangers, telecommunication transmitters, microphones; computer programs for use in telecommunications, namely, computer programs for telecommunication switches, chat applications and telecommunication via the Internet; computer hardware for telecommunications; telephones; telephone switchboards; teleconferencing and video conferencing apparatus; none of the forgoing for the healthcare fieldSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunication services, namely, telecommunications consultation, telecommunications gateway services, telecommunication access services, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Internet based telecommunication services, namely, providing telecommunication connections to the internet or databases; mobile telecommunications network services namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans; voice mail services; telephone and mobile telephone services; telephone services; wireless telephony services; teleconferencing and video conferencing services; providing e-mail fax services; information about telecommunication; advisory services relating to telecommunication; none of the forgoing for the healthcare fieldSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programming for telecommunications; technical advice in relation to telecommunications, namely, advice concerning the design of telecommunications apparatus, networks, and equipment; design of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; none of the forgoing for the healthcare fieldSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 23, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 1, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance