Drawing for FOCUSING LOCATOR

USPTO serial 79185592

FOCUSING LOCATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSON, KRISTIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOCUSING LOCATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers and computer software in the field of tracking, locating, positioning and navigation; real time locating systems consisting of locators, electronic tags, antennas, transmitters of electromagnetic signals, radio transceivers, electric cables, microprocessors, monitorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 14, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 10, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance