USPTO serial 79185651
ELEPHANT BRAKES BY RIETSCHOTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ELEPHANT BRAKES BY RIETSCHOTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
Hannover, DE
Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence L. B. Brown
Terrence L. B. Brown FRESH IP PLC11710 Plaza America Drive, Suite 2000Reston, VA 20190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Brakes for machines; brake systems for machines, namely, brake pads other than for vehicles; brake assembly, namely, disc brakes for machines, brake linings for machines, brake pads other than for vehicles; mechanically, pneumatically, hydraulically, electrically and spring-actuated brakes for machines; brake systems, namely, mechanically, pneumatically, hydraulically, electrically and spring-actuated brake systems for machines, namely, disc brakes for machines, brake linings for machines and brake parts and components, namely, brake linings for machines, disc pads for machines; disc brakes for machines; tools, devices, apparatuses, systems, parts and components, namely, anchor pins, bushings, rollers, springs for repair and maintenance of brakes for machines and of brake systems for machines; machine couplings for power transmission; machine couplings for torque transmission; clutches for machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche van Rietschoten & Houwens GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ELEPHANT BRAKES BY RIETSCHOTEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2024 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |