USPTO serial 79185652
FINE DINING LOVERS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5139518Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2017
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINE DINING LOVERS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea Anderson
Andrea Anderson Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANPELLEGRINO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SANPELLEGRINO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SANPELLEGRINO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FINE DINING LOVERS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 10, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 14, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |