Drawing for COMPLOC

USPTO serial 79185719

COMPLOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPLOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Cable and pipe penetration seals made from metal; cotters, made of metal; compression wedges of metal; sealing wedges of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Cable and pipe penetration seals made from plastic or rubber; wedges of plastic or rubber; compression wedges of plastic or rubber; sealing wedges of plastic or rubberSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019Cable and pipe penetration seals, not of metal; wedges, not of metal; compression wedges, not of metal; sealing wedges, not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 28, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 17, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 1, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance