USPTO serial 79185774
EDDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nagoya-shi, Aichi, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather bags; randsels in the nature of Japanese school satchels; school backpacks; school bags; school knapsacks; school satchels; school book bags; shoe bags for convenient transport of shoes to schools, sports activities, gyms, as well as for travel and storage; business bags in the nature of tote bags, shoulder bags, backpacks and briefcases; boston bags; rucksacks; handbags; shoulder bags; waist bags; reusable shopping bags; wallets; purses; briefcases; attaché cases; travel bags; sports bags; suitcases; tote bags; all-purpose carry bags; business card cases; key cases; pouches for holding make-up, keys and other personal items | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 26, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |