Drawing for MEDIACONCH

USPTO serial 79185794

MEDIACONCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5173558Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2017
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIACONCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J.R. Maddox

J.R. Maddox Henson & Efron, P.A.220 South Sixth StreetSuite 1800Minneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for computer file analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Provision of access to databases containing data obtained from software for computer file analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; research and development of new products for others; technical project studies, namely, conducting of feasibility studies in the field of digital technologies; development, design, installation, maintenance, updating and rental of computer software; computer programming; computer system analysis; design of computer systems; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for computer file analysis; cloud computing featuring software for use in computer file analysis; information technology (IT) consultancy services; electronic data storage; all the aforesaid services intended for software for computer file analysisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 10, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 21, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jun 21, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 20, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 4, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 7, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 28, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 28, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 24, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 25, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 24, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 15, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance