Drawing for DTE SYSTEMS CHIPTUNING NO.1

USPTO serial 79185894

DTE SYSTEMS CHIPTUNING NO.1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5220234Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2017
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DTE SYSTEMS CHIPTUNING NO.1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neda Lajevardi

Neda Lajevardi Lott & Fischer, PL255 Aragon Avenue, Third FloorCoral Gables, FL 33134-5054United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motor vehicle accessories, namely, micro-chips for improving engine performance in motor vehicles; electronic apparatus for controlling the injection process in motor vehicles, namely, power control units that monitor engine performances and deliver re-calculated sensor values to the original engine control unit or directly influence the engine's injectors to increase engine performanceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Installation services, namely, maintenance and installation of motor vehicle accessories in the nature of electronic modules for improving engine performance in motor vehicles and for chip tuning and apparatus for controlling the injection process in motor vehicles, namely, power control units that monitor engine performances and deliver re-calculated sensor values to the original engine control unit or directly influence the engine's injectors to increase engine performanceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programming and software design for electronic performance optimization in combustion engines; technical product development of motor vehicle accessories, namely, electronic modules for improving engine performance in motor vehicles and for chip tuning and apparatus for controlling the injection process in motor vehicles, namely, power control units that monitor engine performances and deliver re-calculated sensor values to the original engine control unit or directly influence the engine's injectors to increase engine performanceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2025PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED—
Dec 19, 2024PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Dec 16, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2024ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 13, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 23, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance