USPTO serial 79185897
NEURALONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEURALONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advice from experts relating to technology; consulting in connection with information technology; consultancy in the field of information technology; consultancy with regard to information technology; professional consultancy relating to technology; consultancy in the field of filtration technology; information technology consultation; consultancy in telecommunications; consultancy in computer technology; consultancy in information technology; professional consultancy services relating to the exploitation of technology; technical consultancy relating to information technology; development of new technologies for third parties; issuing of information in the field of information technology; outsourcing of information technology services; provision of scientific technology information; provision of information in the field of information technology; research in technology; research in the field of measurement technology; research relating to technology; expert opinions relating to technology; compilation of information relating to information technology; support services in the field of information technology; support services in information technology; consultancy services relating to information technology; consultancy services relating to technology; technical consultancy services relating to information technology; consulting services in the field of control technology; consultancy services relating to informatics and information technology; consultancy services relating to information technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |