Drawing for U-DRUM

USPTO serial 79185924

U-DRUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5193415Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2017
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with U-DRUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sylvia A. Petrosky

Sylvia A. Petrosky Sylvia A. Petrosky, Attorney at Law723 North Ridgecliff StreetTallmadge, OH 44278UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of industrial machines, namely, drying drums of non-woven fabricsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 24, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 4, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 18, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 17, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 2, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 2, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance