Drawing for VIRUS

USPTO serial 79185939

VIRUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather wallets; wallets, credit card cases; wallets, card wallets (leatherware); book bags; handbags; sling bags for carrying infants; small bags for men; credit card cases (wallets); leather bags, suitcases and walletsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing for men, women and children; clothing for men; clothing for babies and infants; infants' shoes, shoes and boots; belts (clothing)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Retail of goods of all kinds, in particular with clothing, footwear and headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 3, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance