USPTO serial 79185984
OTTO WILDE SERIOUS GRILLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5229911Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2017
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OTTO WILDE SERIOUS GRILLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Davis
David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie LLP300 E. Randolph StreetSuite 5000Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Grills and barbecues, including gas barbecues and grills, charcoal grills as well as portable and embeddable grills, barbecues and cooking ovens, barbecue smokers; rotisseries; gas-powered griddles, metal grids for holding condiments, corn and potatoes, charcoal rails, and outdoor broilers, all being parts for barbecue grills; portable fire places, barbeque grill igniters; barbeque grill accessories, namely, ceramic briquettes for use in barbecue grills; fitted covers for grill; metal kettles for barbeque grills; and accessories in the nature of grill grates for use with barbeque kettles, roast stands in the nature of wire racks and metal rib racks for holding ribs during cooking, and hoods fitting into tops of barbeque kettles; grease drip trays being relevant parts of barbecues | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Otto Wilde Grillers GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Otto Wilde Grillers GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Otto Wilde Grillers GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named OTTO WILDE SERIOUS GRILLERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |