USPTO serial 79186038
CYBERSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cyber security systems comprising computer hardware and software for network-wide detecting, preventing, blocking, mitigating and fighting harmful consequences of cyber information and attacks on computer controlled enterprises, organizations, infrastructures installations and networks, devising response solutions, handling a stream of alerts, ensuring consistent performance by teams, linking and learning previous incidents, managing multiple incidents, managing cross-organization and continuous cyber-attacks, ensuring privacy control, providing access to past incidents and events, facilitating wider cyber intelligence and analysis and providing advanced cyber security, defense, response and attack; cyber collection systems comprising hardware and software for collecting and intercepting communications and information, namely, web pages, text, video, voice and data; intelligence computer hardware and software for detecting voice, video, email, message, media interaction and text, using access to worldwide web, intranet, wireless network, and other multimedia communication transmitted over telecommunication equipment and networks; computerized hardware and software used to capture video, voice, data, text, signal and alarm; computer software for data management, analysis, interpretation, identification, reporting, and decision support; telecommunication surveillance hardware and software for interception, filtering and analyzing data and voice communications; telecommunication surveillance hardware and software for interception, filtering and analyzing communications on networks, mobile applications, chat applications and webmail services; integrated and modular cyber security systems for the protection of national infrastructures and enterprises, property and individuals from cyber threats including terrorism, crime, fraud, and theft, comprising computer software and hardware for cyber security situation management enabling situation planning, mitigation, response and handling; computer software for investigating and analyzing potential cyber security threats; training and simulation software for training cyber professionals against advanced cyber-attacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |