Drawing for MONIMOTO

USPTO serial 79186124

MONIMOTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONIMOTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex Patel

ALEX PATEL PATEL & ALMEIDA PC16830 VENTURA BLVD SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer peripheral devices, namely, remote distance control and monitoring devices for use in security systems; data processing apparatus for use in security systems; distance recording measuring apparatus; downloadable computer software applications used to operate, manage and monitor security systems, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms; electric signal and warning bells; electric measuring devices for measuring motion, distance, speed of vehicles; electric motion monitoring apparatus, namely, motion detectors; electric theft prevention installations but not for automobiles, namely, theft alarms; global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; navigational instruments for vehicles; recorded computer programmes used to operate, manage and monitor security systems, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms; speed indicators; transmitters of electronic signals; telecommunications transmitters; warning bellsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 27, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 13, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 13, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 13, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 20, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 2, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 1, 2016OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2016OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Oct 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 17, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 13, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 13, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 4, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 4, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 22, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 21, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance