Drawing for FRITZE

USPTO serial 79186146

FRITZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRITZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Brushes, being parts of machines; cleaning apparatus with bristles for machinery operations; components with bristles (bristle carrier) as machinery components for technical applicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
016Painters' brushesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Brooms and brushes; hand brushes and toothbrushes; cleaning apparatus with bristles for manual handlingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 26, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance