Drawing for MAEGE

USPTO serial 79186317

MAEGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAEGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Solomon

Steven J. Solomon Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; creams, milks, lotions, gels and powders (for non-medical use) for the face, body and hands; cosmetic products for body care and beauty care; beauty serums; moisturizing emulsionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Dermatological products; pharmaceutical products for skin careSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 22, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance