Drawing for LE CORDON BLEU

USPTO serial 79186445

LE CORDON BLEU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5193423Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2017
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LE CORDON BLEU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Dolan

Christopher M. Dolan Barnes & Thornburg LLPOne North Wacker DriveSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Coffee grinders, other than hand-operated; crushers for kitchen use, electric; ] domestic electric food blenders; domestic electric juicers; domestic electric food mixers; [ electric food slicers, namely, egg slicing machines; ] electric food blenders; [ electric carving knives; electric egg beaters; ] electric food choppers; electric food grinders; electric food processors; electric food slicers; electric fruit juice extractors; electric fruit peelers; [ electric fruit presses; electric ice crushers; electric juice extractors; electric juicers; ] electric kitchen appliances for chopping, mixing, pressing, namely, electric food processors; electric mixers; electric kitchen tools, namely, electric standing mixers; [ electric meat grinders; electric meat slicers for kitchen use; electric milk frothers; ] electric mixers for household purposes; electric mixers for mixing food; [ electric pasta makers for domestic use; electric pepper mills; electric pizza cutters; electric salt mills; electric sausage stuffers; electric vegetable peelers; electrical coffee grinders; electric squeezers for fruit and vegetable; ] food and beverage processing and preparation machines and apparatus, namely, electric food processors; [ food cutting machines for commercial use; food mixing machines for commercial use; food peeling machines for commercial use; ] electric food preparation machines, namely, electric food blenders; electric food processors; [ electric shredding machines, namely, food shredders; electric food slicing machines for commercial use; ] electric food whisks for household purposes; [ fruit squeezing machines, namely, electric fruit squeezers for household purposes; electric garlic presses; ] electric graters; electric food grinders for household purposes [; electric ice crushers; electric kitchen knives; kitchen machines, namely, electric food choppers ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 31, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 13, 2025INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 16, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 16, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 18, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 2, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 14, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance