Drawing for AGARX

USPTO serial 79186483

AGARX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGARX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus & Sara M. Dorchak

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BOULEVARDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Pet food; animal foodstuffsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 11, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 11, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 11, 2017OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 30, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 1, 2017OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance