USPTO serial 79186559
K BAKEL 100% PRINCIPI ATTIVI ACTIVE PRINCIPLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K BAKEL 100% PRINCIPI ATTIVI ACTIVE PRINCIPLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Whalley
Christopher J. Whalley Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions; almond soap; bath salts, not for medical purposes; cosmetic preparations for baths; beauty masks; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; cosmetics; cosmetic creams; skin whitening creams; deodorant soap; deodorants for personal use; eau de cologne; essential oils; eyebrow cosmetics; eyebrow pencils; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; false eyelashes; hair colorants; hair dyes; hair lotions; hair spray; hair waving preparations; cosmetic kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, and make-up; lavender oil; lavender water; essential oils of lemon; lipsticks; lotions for cosmetic purposes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; make-up; make-up powder; make-up preparations; make-up removing preparations; mascara; mint essence, namely, essential oils; mint for perfumery; mouth washes, not for medical purposes; musk, namely, perfumery; nail care preparations; nail polish; nail varnish; oils for cleaning purposes; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for perfumes and scents; oils for toilet purposes; cosmetic pencils; perfumes; perfumery; pomades for cosmetic purposes; potpourris, namely, fragrances; rose oil for cosmetic purposes; scented linen water; scented wood; shampoos; shaving preparations; shaving soap; antiseptic shaving stones; cosmetic preparations for skin care; starching preparations for laundry and household use, namely, laundry starch; soap; breath freshening sprays; sunscreen preparations; cosmetics, namely, sun-tanning preparations; talcum powder, for toilet use; toilet water; non-medicated toiletries; washing preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Deodorants, other than for personal use for household purposes; eye-wash; menthol vapor bath preparations for babies; thermal water for pharmaceutical purposes, namely, nutritionally fortified water for medical purposes; vaginal washes; vitamin preparations, specifically excluding non-alcoholic herbal dietary supplement beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings and animals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |