Drawing for HI HI GEAR

USPTO serial 79186629

HI HI GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HI HI GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 20, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 17, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 12, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance