Drawing for NASOSURF

USPTO serial 79186728

NASOSURF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5173587Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2017
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NASOSURF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments for delivering medicines to the nasal cavity; inhalers and nasal delivery devices for delivering medicines to the nasal cavity for medical purposes; aerosol dispensers for medical purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 4, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 25, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 7, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 3, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 4, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 26, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 18, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance