USPTO serial 79186747
PATLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and instruments; warning and/or signalling apparatus and instruments using light and sound; warning lights; revolving warning lights; light bars for use as emergency lighting; signal lights; blinkers (signalling lights); flashing lights (luminous signals); luminous signs; road warning lamps; burglar alarm lights; visual and/or sound information devices; buzzers; sirens; electronic sirens; sound alarms; electronic sound alarms; audio synthesizing alarms; bells (warning devices); electric luminescent display panels; LED display panels; signalling panels, luminous or mechanical; anti-theft warning apparatus; computers; monitors (computer hardware); computer peripheral devices; computer software; amplifiers; electronic siren amplifiers; loudspeakers; horns for loudspeakers; microphones; electronic notice boards; display units for computers; LED display units; liquid crystal display units; radio communication apparatus and instruments; switching power supply devices; condensers (capacitors); electric relays; electric switches; electric connectors; electric cables; terminals (electricity); memory devices for use with computers; mounting poles, brackets and tripods for use with warning lights and light bars for use as emergency lighting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 24, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |