Drawing for ROLLPLAY

USPTO serial 79186950

ROLLPLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLPLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Baby carriages; trolleys; bicycles; electric bicycles; electric vehicles; tricycles; electric tricycles; yachts; safety seats for children, for vehicles; remote control vehicles, other than toysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Electro-motion playing car; radio-controlled toy vehicles; toy vehicles; stationary exercise bicycles; wrist guards; skating boots with skates attached; chess games; plastic race track; toys; dollsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 3, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 6, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance