USPTO serial 79186970
BG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric door openers; electric door closers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Alarms; alarms and warning equipment; alarm central units; burglar alarms; theft prevention installations, electric; sender (telecommunication); data processing apparatus; digital optical transmission apparatus; apparatus for the transmission of data; integrated electronic circuits; wireless receivers; transmitters; alarm signalling transmitters; alarm signalling receivers; recording apparatus; computers; computer hardware; computer software; computer software packages; application software for cloud computing services; cameras, digital cameras; spy cameras cameras; monitoring units electric; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers; locks (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Services for the installation of alarms; repair of alarms; maintenance and servicing of security alarms; installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services; electronic communications services; wireless communications services; interactive communication services; computerised communication services; provision of on-line communications services; communication by computer; communication services by radio; wireless transfer of data via wireless application protocols; provision of wireless application protocol services including those utilising a secure communications channel; transmission services; data transmission, but not in regards to financial services, payment solutions, clearing of payments, money transfers, electronic invoices or information services between banks and their customers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2016 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |