USPTO serial 79186985
BRAIN++
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAIN++?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs [downloadable software]; computer programmes [programs], recorded; computer software, recorded; computer software applications, downloadable; computer game programs; monitoring apparatus, electric; theft prevention installations, electric; data processing apparatus; network communication equipment; punched card machines for offices; work attendance checking device; computer hardware | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Financial management; financial information; home banking; electronic funds transfer; savings bank services; issuance of credit cards; providing financial information via a web site; insurance underwriting; securities brokerage; stocks and bonds brokerage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical research; research and development for others; computer software design; updating of computer software; computer software consultancy; rental of computer software; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; cloud computing; information technology [IT] consultancy; electronic data storage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of burglar and security alarms; security consultancy; security consultancy; personal background investigations; dating services; marriage agencies; on-line social networking services; licensing of intellectual property; licensing of computer software [legal services]; intellectual property consultancy | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |