Drawing for ARCCORE

USPTO serial 79186995

ARCCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5293359Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2017
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Josh A. Partington

JOSH A. PARTINGTON HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC11730 PLAZA AMERICA DR. #600RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for software development; computer software development tools; computer software for designing, developing, and building an automotive electronic control unit; computer software for software application development, software system integration, and hardware system integration; computer software for software platform development, namely, a software platform for designing, developing, and controlling computer software embedded in automotive electronic control units; computer hardware relating to the automotive industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Platform as a service PaaS, namely, featuring computer software platforms for software tools for software development managed from a central location; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer programming; design of computer software and computer hardware; updating computer software; consultancy relating to computer software and consultancy relating to the design and development of computer hardware; computer software maintenance; computer system analysis; computer system design; development of computer systems; all the aforesaid services relating to the automotive industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 8, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 19, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 13, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 12, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance