USPTO serial 79187039
DYNEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5547720Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2018
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DYNEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia K. Stephenson
Cynthia K. Stephenson Posz Law Group, PLC.12040 South Lakes Drive Suite 101Reston, VA 20191United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Electric wax knives; ] electric angle grinders and high-speed grinders, cut-off wheels as parts of electric angle grinders used for the treatment of ceramics and metal in the dental field [ ; suction installations, namely, air suction machines and suction pumps, all for protection from splinters and dust during milling and grinding work ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Hand-operated tools and devices, namely, drills, chisels, knives, modelling tools in the nature of scrapers and milling tools in the nature of milling cutters; ] hand-operated disc grinding wheels and hand-operated high-speed grinding wheels; cut-off wheels as parts of hand-operated disc grinding wheels and hand-operated high-speed grinding wheels | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [ Dentistry or dental technology devices and instruments, namely, dental crown mills being milling apparatus for dental purposes, ultrasonic cleaning devices for cleaning gums and teeth used in dentists' offices during dental procedures, dental suction devices in the nature of saliva ejectors, polishing devices in the nature of polishing headpiece for dental purposes, dental polishers, dental margin trimmers, mixing devices in the nature of dental instruments for use in mixing and applying dental materials and compounds during dental procedures, pin drilling devices, mixing plate for use in mixing and applying dental materials and compounds during dental procedures, deflasking dental chisels, devices for cleaning dental prostheses used in dentists' offices during dental procedures, mixing devices in the nature of dental instruments for use in mixing and applying dental moulding material during dental procedures, brushes and interdental brushes for cleaning gums, dental inlays, teeth, artificial teeth and dental prosthesis used in dentists' and dental technician's offices during dental procedures; blasting and fine blasting devices in the nature of sand or steam blasting devices for cleaning gums, dental inlays, teeth, artificial teeth and dental prosthesis in dentists' and dental technician's offices during dental procedures; pins for artificial teeth, namely, pins for saw cut models for making full and partial dentures; ] disc grinders and high-speed grinders and cut-off wheels as parts of dental grinding discs all for dental applications * ; all aforementioned goods for use in the dental field * | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Renfert GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Renfert GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Renfert GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DYNEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |