Drawing for ROMEX

USPTO serial 79187129

ROMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Schneider

MARK D. SCHNEIDER DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP900 WILSHIRE DR STE 300TROY, MI 48084-1600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; unprocessed artificial resins; unprocessed plastics; tempering preparations and soldering chemicals; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; adhesives used in industry; industrial chemicals for the building industry; chemicals for the manufacture of industrial coatings and floors, in particular industrial floor tiles, industrial flagstones, cobblestones, grouts, and curbstones; additives for concrete, in particular fibres reinforcing concrete additivesABANDONED—
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, flagstones, floor tiles, curbstones, cobblestones, grouts and joints, in the form of paving jointing mortar; non-metallic rigid pipes for building, in particular branching pipes and drainage pipes; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; hard mortar; mortar, in particular wall and pavement fixing mortar; geotextiles, namely, erosion control fabric, mats and sheeting, not of metal; geotextiles for the purposes of drainage, stabilizing inclines, absorption, filtration, separation, stabilization and reinforcement of the soil; mats for building purposes, in particular non-metallic drainage mats and bentonite mats being geosynthetic clay liners; non-metallic flooring; concrete; concrete building elements, namely, cobblestones, flagstones, floor tiles and curbstones, grouts and joints, in the form of paving jointing mortar; shuttering, not of metal, for casting concrete; drain traps, not of metal or plasticABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 7, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 27, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2016LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 3, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 15, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 24, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 31, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 26, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance